Monday, 8 March 2010

Step aside sarcasm, you are no longer the lowest form of wit



A few weeks ago I was watching Big Brother’s Big Mouth (I know, I know, for shame!)

Davina McCall was interviewing Vinnie Jones.

A great meeting of minds it was.

At one point Vinnie said to Davina – “you walk like a retard”

Despite Vinnie Jones being unpleasantness personified I was still really shocked.

I was further shocked when Davina, instead of steering them away from this dodgy ground, replied – “I don’t walk like a retard”

Followed up with a funny ‘retard’ walk.

Because ‘retards’ are funny aren’t they?

Apparently so.

The audience laughed uproariously and they blithely carried on with the show.

As the sister of someone with a learning difficulty, and as a right thinking human being, I was deeply offended.

I sat there expecting an apology after the first break, or the second break, or the third break...but nothing.

Neither the producer nor the director thought to have a word with Davina in her ear piece and inform her that she and Vinnie Jones had both just used a really unpleasant word in a derogatory and vicious manner.

It took disability organisations several weeks to get an apology from Channel 4, who at first refused to accept that there had been any wrongdoing whatsoever. Adding that it was all part of the fun, quick-fire nature of the show.

Of course - and I realise this is a clichéd observation, but nevertheless - if it had been a racist remark they would have apologised in a nano second.

And not because Channel 4 are a beacon of equality. If racism wasn’t such a headline grabbing, political hot potato they would doubtless ignore complaints about that too.

It is not, and quite rightly so, acceptable to use the words ‘nigger’ or ‘paki’.

But it’s still ok to use the words ‘retard’ or ‘mong’.

Better than ok; positively hilarious.

During my time on the comedy circuit I’ve been appalled at the way Down’s Syndrome in particular, provides stand-up comedians with hours of material.

I’ve even blocked a group of comedians on Twitter who spent an entire morning trying to think of ‘mong’ puns.

And why? What have disabled people done to offend so many people?

Ah yes, that’s right, precisely nothing. They’re just an easy target is all.

Anyway, Channel 4 eventually apologised, albeit half heartedly, and gave the genius excuse that the reason the word ‘retard’ was aired without an apology, was because the production team were ‘tired’.

Well if tiredness equals poor production values then the entire staff at Channel 4 must be permanently knackered.

(Surely they could get some kip during all those Come Dine With Me repeats?...)

Anyway, the point that I’m (finally) getting to - as I’ve covered this ground before - is this.

The word ‘retard’ needs to be made as unacceptable a slur as any racist or homophobic language.

It needs to be classed as hate speech. Just as crimes against the disabled need to be categorised as hate crimes.

So please support this campaign. It’s called The R Word, is supported by MENCAP and the Special Olympics, and is attempting to stamp out the use of the word ‘retard’.

Please visit them at their website, take the pledge and then tell your friends to do the same.

If a word has no positive usage or connotations, and is only ever applied as an insult or a form of mockery, then it has no value.

Anyone who wants to disagree with me, you’ve every right, but I’d be interested to know why you so desperately need to have this word in your vocabulary.

Get an imagination, or failing that a thesaurus.

There are plenty of decent slurs available to you: nincompoop, jackass, wanker, rogue, miscreant, bastard, botheration.

I’m rather fond of ‘twat’ myself.

And as for the freedom of speech argument?

Well, with rights come responsibilities. Just because you can say something, it doesn’t mean you should.

7 comments:

Catie Wilkins said...

Well put! I particularly like the line:
"And not because Channel 4 are a beacon of equality. If racism wasn’t such a headline grabbing, political hot potato they would doubtless ignore complaints about that too. "
Savage and true!
And I like the rights and responsibilities bit.
I signed that pledge thing but I don't think my name came up on it. Might try it again... (can you do it more than once?)
Incidentally, I've heard a man say he thought the word 'wanker' was offensive to men. I've been trying to make a joke out of it, but have not yet succeeded.

Christina Martin said...

Cheers my dears!

You can try signing it again. I'm sure it would let you know if you're already registered.

Oh that's wonderful! There is definitely a joke there.

Djave said...

In my experience, very few people associate the word "retard" with mental illness or disability.

This campaign seems like a great way to change that.

Christina Martin said...

Djave, you win the prize for weirdest and least coherent comment of the day. Congrats.

Djave said...

Incoherent? Allow me to elucidate.

Most people currently using the word "retarded", in my opinion, use it because it's a cool-sounding Americanism.

They don't make the connection between the word and actual mental illness, and probably don't even consciously realise that it could be used to insult mentally ill people.

The same way that you, for example, didn't seem to realise that "moron" is a synonym for "retard" used by psychologists in living memory, when you wrote in February 2009, without apparent irony, "how did so many people come to be complete morons when it comes to coping with disability?"

I hope this clarifies.

Christina Martin said...

Morning Djave!

Sorry. Your comment before didn't make sense to me. So I just replied in jest. Now untwist those knickers please.

I get a lot of oddballs and spammers leaving comments.

In my defence, it didn't make sense to any of my friends who were round at the time either - and we're all fairly intelligent people if I don't say so myself.

They all thought that you sounded oddly pleased that everyone would finally be using the word 'retard' correctly! Like it was a pet peeve of yours or something.

So, it wasn't just me.

I would beg to differ re how most people view and use the word.

Granted, it's on the rise in the US as a throwaway comment, and some people may be using it thus.

But in my experience, I mostly see people spit the word out with venom, seemingly fully aware of it's implications.

And the reason I can confidently conclude this is that they usually simultaneously alter their voice and face in a way that echoes people with a disablity. You know that whole 'duh' thing.

I also usually hear it paired up with spastic or mong. Both terms that have no other association or source than disability.

Sorry to have riled you so very much by making a jokey comment in my confusion. I literally didn't know what else to say in reply to it.

Finally, according to my thesaurus moron is a synonym of idiot. Maybe I need to buy a new one. If it is associated with 'retard' then I stand corrected. But obviously coming as it was from someone who was clearly standing up for disabled people, I think it's pretty clear where I stand on disability. Irony notwithstanding.

A colleague at MENCAP saw that blog too and didn't have a problem with it, so.

Anyway, apologies to have upset you.

Have a good weekend.

Christina Martin said...

Djave piqued my interest, so I went to thesaurus.com

'Moron' is a synonym of the following words:

Addlepate, blockhead, boob, dimwit, dingbat, dolt, dope, dork, dumbbell, dummy, dunce, fool, halfwit, idiot, ignoramus, imbecile, lamebrain, loony, loser, mental defective, nerd, simpleton

Mental defective aside, my vocabulary just took a big hit.

I also learned that 'moron' comes from the Greek word 'moros' which means dull.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that that's a slightly less offensive origin than 'retard', 'mong' or 'spastic' can boast.

Better than that I learned that the word 'cretin' comes from a dialectal French word for 'Christian'.

So it's also *religious* hate speech to call someone out for acting stupid.

This is an absolute minefield.

From now on I think I'll stick with 'person behaving in a manner that is less than sensible and logical'